hort’ (but if this is so, the plane will be line and the solid a plane; again, how will angles and figures and such things be explained?). And (ii) the same happens as in regard to number; for ‘long and short’, &c., are attributes of magnitude,UGG Weather/Performance, but magnitude does not consist of these, any more than the line consists of ‘straight and curved’,Menn Moncler Clavier, or solids of ‘smooth and rough’.
(All these views share a difficulty which occurs with regard to species-of-a-genus,Nike KD 8 Męskie, when one posits the universals, viz. whether it is animal-itself or something other than animal-itself that is in the particular animal. True, if the universal is not separable from sensible things,Moncler Hermine, this will present no difficulty; but if the 1 and the numbers are separable, as those who express these views say, it is not easy to solve the difficulty, if one may apply the words ‘not easy’ to the impossible. For when we apprehend the unity in 2, or in general in a number,Argentina Landslagsdrakt, do we apprehend a thing-itself or something else?).
Some, then,Chelsea Drakt Barn, generate spatial magnitudes from matter of this sort, others from the point — and the point is thought by them to be not 1 but something like 1-and from other matter like plurality, but not identical with it; about which principles none the less the same difficulties occur. For if the matter is one, line and plane-and soli will be the same; for from the same elements will come one and the same thing. But if the matters are more than one, and there is one for the line and a second for the plane and another for the solid,Parajumpers Damen Irene, they either are implied in one another or not, so that the same results will follow even so; for either the plane will not contain a line or it will he a line.
Again, how number can consist of the one and plurality, they make no attempt to explain; but however they express themselves, the same objections arise as confront those who construct number out of the one and the indefinite dyad. For the one view generates number from the universally predicated plurality, and not from a particular plurality; and the other generates it from a particular plurality, but the first; for 2 is said to be a ‘first plurality’. Therefore there is practically no difference, but the same difficulties will follow,-is it intermixture or position or blending or generation? and so on. Above all one might press the question ‘if each unit is one,Yaya Toure Drakt, what does it come from?’ Certainly each is not the one-itself. It must, then,Belstaff Nové Toxic Blouson Bunda, come from the one itself and plurality,Moncler Cheverny, or a part of plurality. To say that the unit is a plurality is impossible,Bailey Button Triplet 1962, for it is indivisible; and to generate it from a part of plurality involves many other objections; for (a) each of the parts must be indivisible (or it will be a plurality and the unit will be divisible) and the elements will not be the one and plurality; for the single units do not come from plurality and the one. Again,Damskie Barbour Arctic Down Parka, (,the holder of this view does nothing but presuppose another number; for his plurality of indivisibles is a number. Again, we must inquire, in view of this th
相关的主题文章：
http://www.aptnsw.org.au/cgi-bin/show_blog.cgi
http://www.middleeast.org/read.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi |
