hort’ (but if this is so,Mexico Drakt, the plane will be line and the solid a plane; again,Kurtka Moncler Damskie 2014, how will angles and figures and such things be explained?). And (ii) the same happens as in regard to number; for ‘long and short’, &c., are attributes of magnitude,Zlatan Ibrahimovic Drakt, but magnitude does not consist of these, any more than the line consists of ‘straight and curved’, or solids of ‘smooth and rough’.
(All these views share a difficulty which occurs with regard to species-of-a-genus, when one posits the universals,Moncler Bunda, viz. whether it is animal-itself or something other than animal-itself that is in the particular animal. True, if the universal is not separable from sensible things,Bags, this will present no difficulty; but if the 1 and the numbers are separable, as those who express these views say,Parajumpers Damen Irene, it is not easy to solve the difficulty, if one may apply the words ‘not easy’ to the impossible. For when we apprehend the unity in 2, or in general in a number, do we apprehend a thing-itself or something else?).
Some,Belstaff Gangster Mit Bunda, then, generate spatial magnitudes from matter of this sort, others from the point — and the point is thought by them to be not 1 but something like 1-and from other matter like plurality, but not identical with it; about which principles none the less the same difficulties occur. For if the matter is one,San Lorenzo Drakt, line and plane-and soli will be the same; for from the same elements will come one and the same thing. But if the matters are more than one, and there is one for the line and a second for the plane and another for the solid, they either are implied in one another or not, so that the same results will follow even so; for either the plane will not contain a line or it will he a line.
Again,Fiorentina Drakt, how number can consist of the one and plurality,Peony Short Czyścibut 5803, they make no attempt to explain; but however they express themselves, the same objections arise as confront those who construct number out of the one and the indefinite dyad. For the one view generates number from the universally predicated plurality,Tyskland Landslagsdrakt, and not from a particular plurality; and the other generates it from a particular plurality, but the first; for 2 is said to be a ‘first plurality’. Therefore there is practically no difference, but the same difficulties will follow,-is it intermixture or position or blending or generation? and so on. Above all one might press the question ‘if each unit is one, what does it come from?’ Certainly each is not the one-itself. It must, then,CG Menn Langford Parka, come from the one itself and plurality, or a part of plurality. To say that the unit is a plurality is impossible, for it is indivisible; and to generate it from a part of plurality involves many other objections; for (a) each of the parts must be indivisible (or it will be a plurality and the unit will be divisible) and the elements will not be the one and plurality; for the single units do not come from plurality and the one. Again, (,the holder of this view does nothing but presuppose another number; for his plurality of indivisibles is a number. Again, we must inquire, in view of this th
相关的主题文章：
http://www.matsue-yado.com/otoku/clip.cgi
http://www.win775.com/Review.asp?NewsID=212
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi |
