l be able to give a more accurate one,Chaussures New Balance 581; but there will be no definition nor essence.
Or has ‘definition’, like ‘what a thing is’,CG Dame Dawson Parka Norge Salg, several meanings? ‘What a thing is’ in one sense means substance and the ‘this’,CG Menn Lodge Down Vest Norge Salg, in another one or other of the predicates,Dame Moncler Adour Norge Salg, quantity, quality, and the like. For as ‘is’ belongs to all things, not however in the same sense, but to one sort of thing primarily and to others in a secondary way, so too ‘what a thing is’ belongs in the simple sense to substance, but in a limited sense to the other categories. For even of a quality we might ask what it is,PJS Herreklær Blazer Parkas Norge Salg, so that quality also is a ‘what a thing is’,-not in the simple sense, however, but just as, in the case of that which is not,Maillot Willian Pas Cher, some say, emphasizing the linguistic form, that that is which is not is-not is simply, but is non-existent; so too with quality.
We must no doubt inquire how we should express ourselves on each point,[url=http://www.le-guide-du-nord-pas-de-calais.fr/maillot-joueurs-c-390/#PasCher">Maillot Joueurs Pas Cher[/url], but certainly not more than how the facts actually stand. And so now also,Piumini Moncler Johanna, since it is evident what language we use,Canada Goose Chateau Parka, essence will belong, just as ‘what a thing is’ does, primarily and in the simple sense to substance,Ralph Lauren Halsduk, and in a secondary way to the other categories also,Chaussures Nike Air Max TN I,-not essence in the simple sense, but the essence of a quality or of a quantity. For it must be either by an equivocation that we say these are,Belstaff Jackor, or by adding to and taking from the meaning of ‘are’ (in the way in which that which is not known may be said to be known),-the truth being that we use the word neither ambiguously nor in the same sense, but just as we apply the word ‘medical’ by virtue of a reference to one and the same thing, not meaning one and the same thing, nor yet speaking ambiguously; for a patient and an operation and an instrument are called medical neither by an ambiguity nor with a single meaning, but with reference to a common end. But it does not matter at all in which of the two ways one likes to describe the facts; this is evident, that definition and essence in the primary and simple sense belong to substances. Still they belong to other things as well, only not in the primary sense. For if we suppose this it does not follow that there is a definition of every word which means the same as any formula; it must mean the same as a particular kind of formula; and this condition is satisfied if it is a formula of something which is one, not by continuity like the Iliad or the things that are one by being bound together, but in one of the main senses of ‘one’, which answer to the senses of ‘is’; now ‘that which is’ in one sense denotes a ‘this’, in another a quantity, in another a quality. And so there can be a formula or definition even of white man, but not in the sense in which there is a definition either of white or of a substance.
Book VII Chapter 5
It is a difficult question, if one denies that a formula with an added determinant is a definition, whether any of the terms that are not simple but coupled will be definable. For we must explain them by adding a determinant.
相关的主题文章：
http://www.matsue-yado.com/otoku/clip.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://ohh.sisos.co.jp/cgi-bin/openhh/search.cgi |
