for if it were many, 1 would be few), there must be also one which is absolutely many, e.g. 10 is many (if there Under Armour Curry 3 is no number which is greater than 10), or 10,000. How then, in view of this, can number consist of few and Parajumpers Naiset Alaska many? Robert Huth Jersey Either both ought to be predicated of it, or neither; but in fact only the one or the other is predicated.
Book XIV Chapter 2
We must inquire generally, whether eternal things can consist of elements. If they do, they will have matter; for everything that consists of Xabier Etxeita Jersey elements is composite. Since, then, even if a thing exists for ever, out of that of which it consists it would necessarily also, if it had come into being, have come into being, and Belgien Fodboldtrøjer since everything comes to be what it comes to be out of that which is it potentially (for it could not have come to be out of that which had not this capacity, nor could it consist of such elements), and since the potential can be either actual or not,-this being so, however everlasting number or anything else that has matter is, it must be capable of not existing, just as that which is any number of years old is as capable of not existing as that which is a day old; if this is capable of not existing, so is Benoit Tremoulinas Jersey that which has lasted for a time so long that Nike Air Max 1 EM Menn it has no limit. They cannot, then, be eternal, Sergio Busquets Jersey since that which is capable of not existing is not eternal, as we had occasion to show in another context. If that which we are now saying is true universally-that no substance is eternal unless it is actuality-and if the elements are matter that underlies substance, no eternal substance can have elements present in it, of which it consists.
There are some who describe the element which acts with the One as an indefinite dyad, and object to ‘the unequal’, reasonably enough, because of the ensuing difficulties; but they have got rid Tim Krul Jersey only of those objections which inevitably arise from the treatment of the unequal, i.e. the relative, as an element; those which arise apart from this opinion must confront even these thinkers, whether it is ideal number, or mathematical, that they construct out of those elements.
There are many causes which led them off into these explanations, and especially the fact that they framed the difficulty in an obsolete form. For they thought that all things that are would be one (viz. Being itself), if one did not join issue with and refute the saying of Parmenides:
‘For never will this Stefan Ishizaki Jersey he proved, that things that are not are.’
They thought it necessary to prove that that which is not is; for only thus-of that which is and something else-could the things that are be Män Ralph Lauren Pants composed, if they are many.
But, first, if ‘being’ has many senses (for it means sometimes substance, sometimes that it is of a certain quality, sometimes that it is of a certain quantity, and at other times the other categories), what sort of ‘one’, then, are all the things that are, if non-being is to be supposed not to be? Is it the substances that are one, Dzenis Burnic Jersey or the affections and similarly the other categories as well, or all together-slinks:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ad-lib/bbs/index.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi |
